Finding an Optimal Suite of Nodes for a Kubernetes Cluster Operations
As the adoption rate of Kubernetes is growing, more enterprises, PaaS & SaaS providers are implementing multi-tenant Kubernetes clusters to handle their increasing workloads. This situation draws attention towards a single cluster running multiple applications in different environments and departments for particular teams and customers.
This multi-tenant Kubernetes platform enables companies to manage workloads of larger clusters rather than various tiny suites. This feature also benefits companies in resource utilization, process management, and reducing fragmentation.
Companies expanding their cluster usages and capacity are noticing a huge increase in their Kubernetes spendings. The absence of cloud developers and operators can also be the reason behind this sudden price rise for the companies embracing cloud computing solutions. Many times, a lack of cloud transparency leads applications to be unable to calculate further about autoscaling (or complying with set spending budget). This issue results in sudden spikes in the bill.
Therefore, developers should ensure that their Kubernetes clusters are sized according to workloads’ requirements as a Kubernetes best practice.
This article contains information about the latest tools used to control Kubernetes infrastructure spendings in the range of 25–60% in manual systems and more impact in automated systems.
The Working of This KubeCost Tool:
These tools first analyze Kubernetes metrics, such as previous workloads and cloud billing-related data, then automatically create a cluster with the required size and context. They also take the context of the cluster based on their analysis regardless of its use. Then developers should configure the cluster accordingly, which results in better cost balance and robustness of the Kubernetes infrastructure.
Follow the given below recommendations:
- Analyze the history of the consumption of container resources to forecast future needs.
- Consider resource requests and their utilization.
- Make sure that the largest workloads are scheduled well.
- Identify Kube-system replicas or DaemonSet for each node present in the Kubernetes cluster.
- Allocate performance based on the context of the cluster.
- Ensure that shared core machines aren’t allocated for the production or high availability environments.
Utilization of KubeCost Tool:
It is an open-source tool, and organizations can use CLI platforms, like Helm3 or a flat manifest, to install KubeCost. After the tool installation is done, open the Savings page and search the cluster right-sizing function. Then a default recommendation will be visible to users according to their context of cluster development. Plus, KubeCost also allows users to select and customize cluster types based on their needs.
Moreover, this tool is suitable for both Amazon Web Services and Google Cloud platforms. This tool is significantly practical in that it starts working within a second after the installation into the Kubernetes infrastructure.
Point to be noted: The cluster data remains inside of its infrastructure inclined to this tool, and each process is performed within users’ infrastructure.
KubeCost Utilization Best Practices:
In order to get precise recommendations, a cluster should be sized according to the workload requirements. This size-related adequate calculation should be done by setting DaemonSets of workloads for each cluster node. The priority of cluster sizing should be to run workloads more efficiently because a small node is not sufficient to run a large workload with various resources.
To calculate the Kubernetes utilization, the Kubecost allocation model is the most recommended one. Users can use a heuristic approach to get more efficient results to manage the tradeoff between complexity and cost of nodes.
The efficiency of autoscaling software depends on the context of the clusters. And when autoscaling is helpful, it does not allow organizations to add different pools to handle a particular cluster. This scenario leads organizations towards over-provisioning.
If autoscaling over-provision the cluster nodes and resources, then for sure, this operation is a much more complex task. On the contrary, the cluster sizing recommendation tool gives organizations complete authority to control and choose the cluster size from the given recommendation.
Each recommendation is calculated by analyzing a bunch of historical data, so customers can choose either of them without any fear of extra spending because it is a full proof calculation with no memory leak, resource spike, or ill-fitting node issues.
Conclusion:
Need cloud experts’ help in the Kubernetes workloads management? Contact us today or book your 60 min free cloud consultation slot with our cloud engineers’ team. Get the best cloud solution to your problems within 24–48 hours.
